Trying to figure out what it is about this article that rubs me the wrong way, aside from its elitist tone. Used to greatly admire GB, but right now you couldn’t pay me to live there. A doofus PM, a somewhat goofy king, a government that prosecutes and jails people for tweets, rape gangs. Maybe you need another Cromwell. Western Europe is all messed up, don’t try to shift blame.
Insanity, we quite literally depend on the US military for our security. We cannot defend our own soil from simple invasion, let alone a mass military attack on the British mainland. We need them, sadly. If we were not so anaemic I’d see your view more clearly, but this is just suicidal. It would also massively sour the relationship between the US and the UK, which is what we do not need. It’s not a benefit, unless you just dislike America to the point of suicidal self harm.
If the Democrats win in 2028, which seems likely right now, then it would really be prudent to limit their influence by removing their military in Europe. They won't let the relative passivity of the Biden years happen again.
Good article, they need to go at some point. No more Sacoolas incidents. Also, nothing will enrage native Britons more than paying for ethnic landfill to live in London whilst we are expected to die for them. Conscripting natives and then training and arming them could go very badly for the State.
Now that Trump is done with Iran he should conquer the UK and wipe out its Muslim and Indian and Paki population and make it a homeland for Whites to flee to to escape blacks, Jews, and the rest of the filthy subhumans on earth. He won't, because he's a filthy kike. But Britain needs to be Whitesrael, a homeland for Whites, and anyone who opposes that goal is subhuman scum. Behold the birth of Londonism, Zionism for Whites, the seeking of the founding of a White ethnostate in Britain, the reconquest of OUR ancestral homeland given to us by OUR God a bajillion years ago.
It was not Ted Cruze but yet another Bush. Sundance has a long analysis from the time explaining the manipulation of money and candidates to drive a scenario where?Jeb? who ever had more than 10 to 15% support would win the nomination.
It was a great plan until Trump came down the Golden Escalator as said two things: The Social Security of Americans is sacred and Illegals must go!
Prior to that the course of the election was to have ?Jeb? And Hill argue over how and how much to cut SS funding. Whoever we elected was going to gut Social Security because that is what we elected them to do!
However you feel about Trump, the tall one - not the current short guy with the latex mask - remember: you, your mom or someone close to you has been receiving Social Security for the last 12 years because of him.
Great article. I wonder if the abrogation of Status of Forces Agreements (or at least the ones supplementary to NATO, if we wish to keep that organisation) is the way forward here. The argument against them is clear (national sovereignty, justice) and there are sufficient examples of where they have led to perverse results, most prominently in Germany and Italy.
Trying to figure out what it is about this article that rubs me the wrong way, aside from its elitist tone. Used to greatly admire GB, but right now you couldn’t pay me to live there. A doofus PM, a somewhat goofy king, a government that prosecutes and jails people for tweets, rape gangs. Maybe you need another Cromwell. Western Europe is all messed up, don’t try to shift blame.
The USA is 55% White and you've spent a decade arguing about the definition of a woman. Speaking of which, can you even define an American?
Insanity, we quite literally depend on the US military for our security. We cannot defend our own soil from simple invasion, let alone a mass military attack on the British mainland. We need them, sadly. If we were not so anaemic I’d see your view more clearly, but this is just suicidal. It would also massively sour the relationship between the US and the UK, which is what we do not need. It’s not a benefit, unless you just dislike America to the point of suicidal self harm.
If the Democrats win in 2028, which seems likely right now, then it would really be prudent to limit their influence by removing their military in Europe. They won't let the relative passivity of the Biden years happen again.
Good article, they need to go at some point. No more Sacoolas incidents. Also, nothing will enrage native Britons more than paying for ethnic landfill to live in London whilst we are expected to die for them. Conscripting natives and then training and arming them could go very badly for the State.
Now that Trump is done with Iran he should conquer the UK and wipe out its Muslim and Indian and Paki population and make it a homeland for Whites to flee to to escape blacks, Jews, and the rest of the filthy subhumans on earth. He won't, because he's a filthy kike. But Britain needs to be Whitesrael, a homeland for Whites, and anyone who opposes that goal is subhuman scum. Behold the birth of Londonism, Zionism for Whites, the seeking of the founding of a White ethnostate in Britain, the reconquest of OUR ancestral homeland given to us by OUR God a bajillion years ago.
Argument.
It was not Ted Cruze but yet another Bush. Sundance has a long analysis from the time explaining the manipulation of money and candidates to drive a scenario where?Jeb? who ever had more than 10 to 15% support would win the nomination.
It was a great plan until Trump came down the Golden Escalator as said two things: The Social Security of Americans is sacred and Illegals must go!
Prior to that the course of the election was to have ?Jeb? And Hill argue over how and how much to cut SS funding. Whoever we elected was going to gut Social Security because that is what we elected them to do!
However you feel about Trump, the tall one - not the current short guy with the latex mask - remember: you, your mom or someone close to you has been receiving Social Security for the last 12 years because of him.
Great article. I wonder if the abrogation of Status of Forces Agreements (or at least the ones supplementary to NATO, if we wish to keep that organisation) is the way forward here. The argument against them is clear (national sovereignty, justice) and there are sufficient examples of where they have led to perverse results, most prominently in Germany and Italy.