9 Comments
User's avatar
Gjuki's avatar

Charlie Kirk was one of the most influential political figures in the United States of America and was a brazenly international political actor with operations in Britain and Japan alongside the States. Should Nasty African Oxford Guy be expelled for being a libtard and espousing unilaterally accepted libtard beliefs? Not my business. But it is important to remember that someone like Kirk was a big deal. The best analogy would be the student president of Harvard publicly mocking the death of the head of the AfD, or Rupert Lowe, or something. Perhaps that doesn't change your mind, which is fine, but I believe it to be worth mentioning. I agree with the sentiment that Woke is Bad and that the transcendent Values of all true Gamers ought to be protected from Wokeness, however. Even if I as an American gain from the political persecution of Nasty African Oxford Libtard Guy, whom a sexually attractive member of my family met last year and did not care for. This is all to say that you are not particularly wrong about the application of emotions here, but that Americans, who are actively tortured by Woke, libtards, and the glee libfarts take in glorifying the death of chuds, White people, and men in general, have every reason to be angry with the chap, if I may borrow a term from the people I have been separated from for 350 years or so. Much love and appreciate your forward-thinking perspective as always.

Expand full comment
J’accuse's avatar

Thanks for clearing that up and appreciate kind words, for the record, there wasn't any irony or bitchiness in the 'I don't know who he is' line, I genuinely only know of him as this vague 2015 era ghost who debated Fuentes, to me it sounded like he was the head of the Federation of Conservative Students but it appears his influence was more important in U.S context.

Expand full comment
Gjuki's avatar

I did not sense any malice. He started making himself known in England three months ago, and even then, Turning Point activity there is not exactly widely reported or all that relevant. Every young person in America knows who he was and either vaguely respected him or carried deranged hatred towards him for perceived fascist, National Socialist tendencies. His superstardom was a fairly recent development spurred on by hysteria around the 2024 presidential election.

Expand full comment
Seth's avatar

This is just part of a power struggle within the Union. Once hes gone some tory boy will replace him.

Expand full comment
J’accuse's avatar

Yeah that's what I thought seeing the story break, only time Oxbridge makes the news its some hack on the make but degree to which the Griftosphere is amplifying the story makes it worth pushing back.

Expand full comment
Seth's avatar

Fair enough, great article as usual.

Expand full comment
C A's avatar

I think this person should be opposed for whatever reason is available, he is a product of the violence of DEI against native brits (PPE at Oxford off the back of ABB at A level??!!) and will be nothing but a force for ethnic dispossession and resentment for the rest of his life. These people are poison, his immediate urge to "lol, lmao" about someone he had met being shot belies a fundamental tendency toward hostility to non-black, non-leftists, such trollishness and contrarianism is not of the same sort as that of the gamer, which is laden with irony and rooted in the sense of Justice Thwarted rather than this man's humourless tribal clucking at the death of a perceived enemy. Getting such people fired is an end in and of itself and must be celebrated.

Expand full comment
J’accuse's avatar

I am much smarter than you.

Expand full comment
Gjuki's avatar

The Right Wing already lumps Gamers in with the fellow in question's edginess to a considerable extent, and would be just as quick to call for similar treatment of a Meritocratic Oxford President.

Expand full comment