Rupert, don't betray your base

We are with Mr Wolf

What do we mean when we talk about the Restore ‘base’? We are referring, for the most part, to the various wolves, frogs and foxes who have attached themselves to Rupert Lowe’s newest political party. They are the living, breathing heart of Britain’s newest political party. They want total remigration. Without fear or favour. England for the English. End of discussion. Whatever your views on these policies, it is right, fair and proper in any Parliamentary Democracy that party memberships have their views reflected by their respective leaderships. Unless that is, you are part of the containment strategy.

Here is the truth. The animals are being let down by Restore’s cautious self-serving leadership, many of whom will say the old slogans but do not believe completely in their principles. They talk a tough game, but when it comes to their own friends, families and Jamaican husbands they aren’t ready to walk the walk. ‘Total remigration for thee’, but not, it seems, for me, when it comes to deporting the half-English children I’ve sired with my Iranian mail order bride. I give it three weeks before we start hearing about the need for ‘Sensible Nationalism’.

Restore advisors are also making unforced errors elsewhere, for example, saying that young girls who have been victimised by Pakistani rape gangs should have gone to church more, even announcing their admiration for the conservative values of the British Muslim community. There is a time and place for these rather ‘one-nation’ of views, but surely these people would be more comfortable in say, the Conservative Party? They could join and be part of Mrs Badenoch’s renewal programme, or even a ‘reformed Conservative party’, as Lowe and others suggested several times last year. Just watch this video from 18:40 onwards and judge his response yourself:

Whilst Restore should remain a broad church there still must be uncompromising values which unite it. And opposition to Pakistani rape gangs would seem, to me, to be non-negotiable. Surely having the second-in-command of Restore suck up to Islam live on camera is more of an infraction than finding out that a regional branch organiser is a homosexual, a la Homeland?

Instead of making a firm commitment to remigration, or outlining a strong position on Islam, or the rape gangs, Restore’s team seem to be distracted by other, less important policy commitments. Legalising pepper spray, as an example, or their right to work from home. Whilst it is important to set forward a broad policy agenda, it is surely most important that a nationalist party evince their position on racial and ethnic identity before worrying about these fripperies?

Then there is, of course, Lowe himself, who appears to be betraying the very principles of remigration, saying in the first interview that he has been allowed to give in weeks that he did not agree with deporting British passport holders en masse, and that he would always respect the rule of law, moaning that Nigel Farage was making him seem too right-wing.

Then there are the other concerns. For example, why has Rupert not taken a position on the state of Israel? Could he secretly be a Zionist? Could he be one of the subversives? It is very worrying that he has not made his position on this issue clear.

Unless Rupert clears some of these things up, the base will be forced to conclude that the leadership of yet another ‘based’ organisation does not want to go to prison, or have their careers permanently ruined, and so they will continually dilute their platform until the extremists in their ranks revolt – and the whole thing blows up - is simply unthinkable.

So here is my (admittedly unsolicited) advice for Rupert Lowe and the rest of the team at Restore UK. Instead of another unoriginal, over-long policy paper which has been cribbed together from other people’s work, a clear, crisp one-page document setting out unambiguous answers to the following questions:

To Rupert

• Do you plan to deport every single non-white person living in Britain?

• Should Kemi Badenoch be deported from Britain?

• Was Nick Griffin mistreated by the media?

• Let us say that an Asian woman, and a White man were to copulate. Would their children be allowed to stay?

• Should we issue a formal apology to Germany for the role the Allies played in the Dresden bombings?

• Do you accept the official death toll historians have put forward for the Holocaust?

If Rupert cannot give firm answers to these questions, then there is little to separate him from Farage. If you believe he is ‘playing the game’ by refusing to take these difficult positions until he is in power, you have no answer to the same claim that is made by Reform supporters regarding their own leader.

Come on Rupert. The base wants to see what you are made of.